headerimg3newnew.gif
 

Background

The conveyancing process is extremely paper heavy which is not unusual for industry practice. 

Currently, the business can send up to 80 documents to customers during a conveyancing transaction.

For documents that require signatures, customers will have to go through the steps below in order to finalise the signing process:

Screen Shot 2020-07-21 at 1.34.40 pm.png

PAIN POINTS ASSOCIATED TO THE CURRENT SIGNING PROCESS

Customers

  • a lot of effort required to complete and sign a document

  • some don’t have printers adding more friction to their experience

  • scan documents in order to keep a copy for their reference

  • spend money on post

Operational Team

  • have to manually enter the handwritten data input by customers into the database

  • difficult to extract data of illegible handwriting

  • manual data entry increase potential for inaccuracies and risk in transactions


Business

  • conveyancing transaction on hold for up to 14 days until signed documents return – increasing the chances of missing key deadlines

  • lack of efficiency through the use of manual tasks

  • operational team can’t focus on higher values tasks


CHALLENGE

How might we implement e-signing capabilities within the business to realise immediate operational and customer
experience benefits?

 

 

Project Approach

 

 

 

Understanding the current business signing landscapeDiscovery key findings

discovery key findings

Interview operational team

to understand systems used and peculiarities of each state

Research artifact:

customer journey

Audited documents

to define which will be eligible for e-signing based on legislation

Research artifact:

customer journey

Mapped current customer journey

to define actions and touch points by users

Research artifact:

customer journey

Investigated database system 

to define how data is currently pulled and automation opportunities

Research artifact:

customer journey

Tech Workshops 

to define complexity between 2 solutions and estimate project velocity

Research artifact:

customer journey

Investigated 3rd party e-signing platform

capabilities to define how can it bypass the current system used without 

Research artifact:

customer journey

 

 

future user journey

Marketplace_Illu-03.png
 

 

Who are the marketplace “champions” and what conventions can BIRDI learn from them?

CompetitorAnalysis.png
 

 

What did we learn from the current website and platform?

Before moving ahead to the design stage, we had one final area to investigate, BIRDI’s current website. As the main gate to the platform, it was paramount to test with new users how clear the value proposition was and how intuitive the user flow felt to them.

Test 1 – how clear is the value proposition?

CurrentWebsite_Tests1A.png
 

TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE RULE OF THUMB BELOW:

“Users often leave Web pages within 10–20 seconds, but pages with a clear value proposition can hold people's attention for much longer.”

Source: Nielsen Norman Group (UX/UI consulting firm) 

 
CurrentWebsite_Tests1B.png

Test 2 - HOW intuitive IS THE INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE?

 

 

Time to sketch and define the screen flows

Based on on the research data that was brought to light, such as business needs and user flow painpoints.

ScreenFlowDerekNew-01.png
 

 

Lastly, validate the proposed designs by testing the
hi-fi prototype

Once we were satisfied with our prototypes, we conducted A/B testing and usability testing with users in order to validate the proposed design solutions. All key feedback that emerged from it was addressed in the second round of design iteration.

Test 3 - HOW CLEAR IS THE REVISED VALUE PROPOSITION?

Click on the images to zoom in and see the information in detail


test 4 – USABILITY TESTING AND ITERATING HI-FI PROTOTYPE

Click on the images to zoom in and see the information in detail


FINAL SCREEN FLOW

FinalFlowKaren-02.png
 

 

Summary

Helping BIRDI implement a Marketplace feature into their current platform that will connect commercial drone pilots with potential clients. We conducted a number of research methodologies, followed by ideation and prototype development. The proposed solutions were well received by the client and are currently being put into place by their developers.

Research Methodologies

User interviews, surveys, usability testings, treejack and competitor analysis

Design Methodologies

Sketching, wireframing, hi-fi prototyping in Figma, A/B testings, usability testings and design iterations